C717 Business Ethics Practices Paper

As an employee of the marketing firm, some of your rights and responsibilities include the right to a safe and healthy work environment, the responsibility to adhere to the company’s ethical standards and policies, and the right to fair compensation for your work.
As an employer, the marketing firm has the ethical responsibility to treat its employees fairly and with respect, to provide them with a safe and healthy work environment, and to ensure that they are compensated fairly for their work.
One ethical business dilemma that could be used to demonstrate employee understanding of the company’s ethical standards might be a situation in which a new employee is offered a job with a higher salary than their current coworkers who have been with the company for a longer period of time. The dilemma is whether to accept the higher salary, which may be perceived as unfair by their coworkers, or to negotiate a lower salary that is more in line with the salaries of their colleagues.
From a utilitarian perspective, the ethical dilemma in part A3 can be evaluated by considering the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In this case, accepting the higher salary may benefit the individual employee by providing them with greater financial rewards, but it may also cause resentment and dissatisfaction among their coworkers, which could negatively impact the overall morale and productivity of the team. From a relativistic perspective, the ethical dilemma can be evaluated by considering the individual’s personal values and beliefs. In this case, the individual may choose to accept the higher salary if they value financial success and career advancement, but they may also choose to negotiate a lower salary if they value fairness and maintaining good relationships with their coworkers.
Two common ethical decisions that reflect corporate ethics and responsibilities that employees can face while working in a corporate setting might include decisions related to conflicts of interest and workplace harassment. In the case of conflicts of interest, employees may be faced with the decision of whether to disclose a personal or financial interest that could influence their professional judgement or actions. In the case of workplace harassment, employees may be faced with the decision of whether to report incidents of harassment or discrimination that they have witnessed or experienced.
Both of the ethical decisions in part A5 present ethical dilemmas because they require individuals to weigh the potential consequences of their actions against their personal values and beliefs. In the case of conflicts of interest, individuals may justify unethical behavior by rationalizing that their personal interests do not significantly influence their professional judgement or actions. In the case of workplace harassment, individuals may justify not reporting incidents by arguing that they do not want to cause trouble or be seen as a troublemaker. In both cases, these justifications may be used to avoid the potential negative consequences of acting ethically.

C160 implementing a Nursing Education Curriculum Discussion

C717 Business Ethics Practices Paper

Stop Stressing. Your Academic Success is Guaranteed.