Essay ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment DeVry
ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment DeVry
ETHC 445 Week 3 GREATER GOOD ANALYSIS
Working in teams, consider the following three problems. In writing a paper about each problem, identify the consequences of the actions taken, and then determine whether the actions taken represented a greater good, who would benefit from the good, and whether the consequences ethically justify the decisions and actions.
The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City, but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry.
A college instructor is pursuing her doctorate in night school. To gain extra time for her own studies, she gives her students the same lectures, the same assignments, and the same examinations semester after semester without the slightest effort to improve them.
Todd and Edna have been married for three years. They have had serious personal problems. Edna is a heavy drinker, and Todd cannot keep a job. Also, they have bickered and fought constantly since their marriage. Deciding that the way to overcome their problems is to have a child, they stop practicing birth control, and Edna becomes pregnant.
Using what you have learned from collaborations, discussions, and readings up to this week, explore your answers to these ethical dilemmas. How would Locke have addressed or solved the problem? Explain how his ethics and the answer he may have given are different from or the same as yours.
Compose a 2 page paper and oral narration of 2 minutes, discussing all three ethical dilemmas in depth.
Rubric
Greater Good Analysis
| Greater Good Analysis | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose The analyses have clear purpose that begins with a solid introduction/thesis, and compels the reader forward. | 30.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks | 30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development Writer plumbs the depth of the ethical dilemmas with evident granular detail. Team input and course materials are leveraged powerfully and with reflective detail. | 30.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks | 30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, StyleDescription of criterion Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with meaning. | 30.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks | 30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides | 20.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks | 20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration | 15.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks | 15.0 pts |
| Total Points: 125.0 |
Stop Stressing. Your Academic Success is Guaranteed.
Domyassignment is your direct route to higher grades. Thousands of students trust our PhD-level experts to deliver 100% original, custom-written papers—from tough essays to massive dissertations.
